Peter Kramer Responds to Recent Criticisms of Antidepressants

As the previous post and a post from a few weeks ago highlight, criticism of the widespread use of antidepressants and other psychopharmaceuticals – especially in the United States – has appeared to grow in strength recently.  For this Sunday’s New York Times, Peter D. Kramer, the author of the influential book Listening to Prozac (1993), has written an opinion piece making the case for the efficacy of antidepressants.  “In Defense of Antidepressants” argues that critics, such as Marcia Angell, overstate their cases:

In the end, the much heralded overview analyses look to be editorials with numbers attached. The intent, presumably to right the balance between psychotherapy and medication in the treatment of mild depression, may be admirable, but the data bearing on the question is messy.

As for the news media’s uncritical embrace of debunking studies, my guess, based on regular contact with reporters, is that a number of forces are at work. Misdeeds — from hiding study results to paying off doctors — have made Big Pharma an inviting and, frankly, an appropriate target. (It’s a favorite of Dr. Angell’s.) Antidepressants have something like celebrity status; exposing them makes headlines.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: