CfP – Tales from the Asylum: Patient Narratives and the (De)construction of Psychiatry

Tales from the Asylum

Patient Narratives and the (De)construction of Psychiatry

L0025917 Charcoal drawing: head from dissection

What is the patient’s role in shaping psychiatric practice? Thirty years after Roy Porter’s seminal article exhorting historians to turn to the neglected half of the doctor-patient dyad,[1] the time has come to reexamine the state of psychiatry and its history. Time and again (re)defined through a polyphony of narratives, mental illness has gone through a number of important changes over the past two centuries. Patients have played a significant role in these developments. Yet their stories in many ways remain to be told. At times frustrated, at times empowered, these men and women have used various channels to voice their suffering. How has madness been depicted, experienced, told by its main protagonists? How has its understanding been affected by broader socio-cultural developments, and vice versa? How have these changes come to shape and give rise to new identities? Delving into madness and its many narratives reveals a rich and intricate web of stories.

This special issue aims to provide a fresh and novel look into these psychiatric tales by critically reexamining recent historical and historiographical developments. From “outsider art” to clinical diaries, from popular accounts to autobiographical novels and from heated manifestoes to asylum scribbles—patients have cried out their ills in a variety of forms. These real and imagined stories of mental illness shed light on the complex ways in which psychiatry has been construed, explained and fictionalized since its inception. How have individual experiences influenced the construction of clinical categories? How have patients (and indeed their loved ones) come to play a decisive role in effecting medical and extra-medical changes? In what ways have patients chosen to voice their oppression? How have their demands been met by the legal system? And how have various methods of treatment—from the asylum to Freud to the DSM to the psychopharmacological turn—been accepted or rejected by those protagonists in differing social, cultural and political settings? By focusing on psychiatry’s ever-fluid identity, this issue will investigate the varied ways in which the patients’ voices have guided this discipline’s construction, deconstruction and reconstruction from 1800 to the present.

We welcome papers from both early career and more established scholars dealing with the above topics from historical, historiographical, theoretical and anthropological perspectives. Themes include (but are by no means limited to) accounts of mental illness examined through the following lenses:

  • Non-Western patient accounts
  • The impact of class and gender on formulations of mental illness
  • The juxtaposition of views “from above” and “from below”
  • The influence of the anti-psychiatry debate
  • Unedited correspondences between patients and physicians
  • Challenges to traditional (e.g., Foucauldian) theoretical approaches
  • The boundaries between fact and fiction
  • Alternative and little-known modes of representation
  • The impact of changing socio-political contexts on patient experience
  • The role of patients in altering diagnostic classifications and curative methods
  • Family and outsiders’ accounts
  • Particularities of psychiatric (vs. non-psychiatric) patients and their changes over time

Interested prospective authors should send 250-word paper descriptions, along with a tentative title and a short biographical statement, to H-Madness co-editor Alexandra Bacopoulos-Viau at abv233@nyu.edu by 30 June 2014. The full proposal with the selected contributions will be sent to a history of medicine journal shortly thereafter in view of an upcoming special issue.

 

—-

[1]Roy Porter, “The Patient’s View: Doing Medical History From Below”, Theory and Society, vol. 14, no. 2 (March 1985): 175-198

Image courtesy of the Wellcome Library, London

  1. Some of us were exhorting the public to cease their voyeurism, long before Roy Porter’s article. See http://clarespark.com/2009/06/04/modernity-and-mass-death/, a response to the exhibition of Outsider Art in Los Angeles (also to Patrick Susskind’s best seller Perfume), that I viewed as exploitative and reactionary and said so on the radio here. Sadly, some agrarian conservatives blame urbanized modernity itself for mental illness. See http://clarespark.com/2009/11/19/the-scary-city-lamprecht-becker-lynd/.

  1. January 21st, 2015
    Trackback from : page=1

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: