Article: Shell Shock in New Zealand

The February issue of Social History of Medicine has just been released online and contains an article by Gwen A. Parsons entitled “The Construction of Shell Shock in New Zealand, 1919–1939: A Reassessment.” The abstract reads:

This article explores the competing constructions of shell shock in New Zealand during and after the Great War. It begins by considering the army’s construction of shell shock as a discipline problem, before going on to consider the medical profession’s attempts to place it within a somatic and then psychogenic paradigm. While shell shock was initially viewed as a psychogenic condition in New Zealand, within a few years of the end of the war it had become increasingly subject to medical understandings of the psychiatric profession, who dominated the treatment of the mentally ill. It is the psychiatric understanding of shell shock which generally defined the treatment of shell shocked veterans within New Zealand after the war. In addition, this medical definition shaped but did not entirely define the government’s repatriation response to shell shocked soldiers. In a number of cases the government saw its responsibility to shell shocked soldiers as going beyond the limits of the psychiatric paradigm, and it responded positively to the veteran lobbying for extensions to the repatriation provisions for shell shocked soldiers. This article concludes by considering why the treatment of New Zealand’s shell shocked soldiers has generally been viewed so negatively within the national historiography.

For more information, click here.

2 thoughts on “Article: Shell Shock in New Zealand

  1. strona domowa says:

    I think this is one of the most vital info for me. And i’m glad
    reading your article. But wanna remark on few general things, The web site style is wonderful,
    the articles is really great : D. Good job, cheers Rusztowania przejezdne

  2. Christine says:

    Reblogged this on Freud in Oceania and commented:
    An excellent article. It appears that the New Zealand response was somewhat similar to that in Australia where John Springthorpe mounted an active campaign for the recognition of shell-shock in the government’s repatriation response.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s